Peer Review Agreement

 

Thank you for agreeing to participate with the peer review process of Angelion. The importance of this process is to initially unite all those who are most familiar with the lexicon and landscape of World Peace, as well as to facilitate the co-creative development of the Consensus Reality Survey that will be presented to all of humanity with the greatest speed and grace. This survey represents a microcosm of Angelion, which is why some of Angelion’s Mission Dependent Agreements have been included.

The First of Six Mission Dependent Agreements for achieving World Peace is the Greatest Agreement:

  • The Ultimate Litmus Test of Truth
  • A Cosmic/Divine Subpoena
  • Check-Mate on Cognitive Dissonance

"All truth passes through three stages.  First, it is ridiculed.  Second, it is violently opposed.  Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schophenhaur

1. Would I like to see all those who are for World Peace united around the exploration of the greatest and most Effortless Agreement which Humanity could and would obviously Unite around?*

I agree to participate in a month long peer review, driven by the following Guidelines:

2. I agree to answering the Angelion survey, which I understand may take up to 3 hours. *
3. I agree to participate in at least one of four 3 hour video conferences per month (1 hour presentation, 1 hour Q&A, 1 hour open dialogue), which involves each participant sharing their perspective, asking at least three questions about the survey, as well as nominating and/or affirming at least three agreements that they feel all Peace Advocates could and would obviously agree to for achieving World Peace.*
4. I agree to write a testimony with a minimum of 555 words describing what I think and feel could go right if all those who are for World Peace were presented with Angelion, as well as what I think the implications would be if they all agreed.*
5. I agree to write a testimony with a minimum of 555 words describing what I think and feel could go wrong if all those who are for World Peace were presented with Angelion, and express which questions I'd nominate the exploration of, for transcending those scenarios.*

Granted that upon completing the one month peer review process you have found that this strategy is indeed irrefutable, has yet to be refuted, and/or you simply feel the continuation of this peer review is worthwhile, you are invited to also agree to the following Guidelines.  These Guidelines secure the continuation and expansion of this peer review process for insuring that all Cultural Creatives, Professors, Nobel Peace Prize Laureates, Luminaries, and Visionary Leaders are invited to participate.  This involves a balanced demographic of Youth, Women, Men and Elders from all over the world.

6. When at least 144 official peer review participants have each pledged to make a monthly investment towards supporting the continued expansion of this peer review process, I will be one of them in the amount of... *
7. When 144,000 Angel Philanthropists have each pledged to donate $1 per month towards the continued peer review process of this World Peace Formula, until it has been adequately refuted, will I be one of them?*
8. When 12,000 Angel Philanthropists have each pledged to donate $12 per month towards the continued peer review process of this World Peace Formula, until it has been adequately refuted, will I be one of them?*
9. How much money would I pledge towards incentivizing the unification of 144,000 Angel Philanthropists from each country, totaling 28 Million Angel Philanthropists Worldwide, each agreeing to contribute $12 per month towards the continuation of this Peer Review process?*
10. Would you agree to respond to updated versions of Angelion, co-creatively developed by the official peer review community, granted that each version requires less time to complete, and you still feel that it is valuable to support the peer review's continuation?*
11. I will nominate a minimum of 12 more peer review participants per month until I have confidently presented a refutation to the peer review community and responded to at least three rounds of Constructive Feedback. i.e., Conversational Triangulation to insure proper understanding of everyone's perspectives.*
12. Peace-O-Meter: What is your current level of certainty regarding the possibility of World Peace being achieved in the next 10 years? *
0
80
100
13. Is there anything you would recommend adding or removing from these agreements?
14. As a fundamental part of this Peer Review's evolution, if you have said no to any of the above please take a moment to share why.
Please create your account below.  Your email will not be used for any other purposes than communications from this project to you, which we will keep minimal.
Name:
E-mail:*
Please create a password for your account:*
Password confirmation:*
Word Verification: